Former Club Manager and Refs on Trial for Soccer Corruption
A former soccer club manager was put on trial Tuesday morning as the first round of Chinese soccer corruption trials went into the second day.
Two soccer referees will also appear before the Intermediate People’s Court of Dandong in another Liaoning city later on Tuesday.
Wang Po, former general manager of Shaanxi Guoli club, stood trial on charges of bribe-taking and fraud in the Intermediate People’s Court of Tieling in northeast China’s Liaoning province.
Born in 1955, Wang Po used to work as a police officer before starting his own business. He became general manager of Shaanxi Guoli in 2003, moving the relegated club to Ningbo, Zhejiang, in 2004 and to Harbin, Heilongjiang, in 2005 before the club was disqualified from the second tier league for failing to pay up players’ wage.
Then Wang became general manager of Tibet Huitong club in late 2005, moved the club to Taiyuan, Shanxi, and changed the club’s name to Shanxi Wellsend in 2006.
Wang is notorious for using his position to take bribes for match-fixing and also allegedly bet on matches involving his own team with an overseas football gambling website to make money. He was detained by police in the nation-wide crackdown on soccer corruption in 2009.
Referees Huang Junjie and Zhou Weixin are both charged with taking bribes as nonstate staff with Zhou facing an additional count of bribing civil servants.
Huang from Shanghai had worked as a soccer ref for more than 20 years. He was selected as one of the three nominees for the ideal referee of the year in 2009 even though a series of controversial rulings were made by him during the season.
In early 2010, Huang was taken away by the police.
Like Huang, Zhou was also often caught with controversial rulings and sometimes even wrong decisions.
During a Chinese Super League match between Beijing Guoan and Shenyang Jinde on Oct. 2, 2004, Zhou ruled a penalty kick in favor of Shenyang in the second half, which aroused furious protest from the players and coach of Beijing.
The Beijing team refused to continue the match and left the pitch out of rage and Zhou ruled the the match ended with Beijing losing.
The Chinese Football Association later slapped an eight-match ban on Zhou for his “misjudgment” in the match, even though many suspected Zhou made the mistake on purpose.
The long-awaited trials for corruption in Chinese soccer started on Monday morning in Tieling with Zhang Jianqiang, ex-director of CFA’s referee committee, being the first to face court.
The ex-deputy director of the Chinese Football Administrative Center, Yang Yimin and Lu Jun, the ideal known Chinese soccer ref who once officiated in World Cup and Olympic Games, will stand trial on Wednesday.
- Soccer: Football Ferns to play USA in Olympic build up
- Titans beat Bombers, advance to sectionals
- Soccer / Premier League / Hapoel TA blanked by Hap. Haifa
- Red Bull Juniors holen Punkt in Anif
- Video: Eamon Zayed's brilliant hat-trick in the Tehran derby
- Surf Cup XXXII
- Milan legend Nesta to play last Serie A match
- German FA president reiterates Qatar criticism
- EXCLUSIVE | Canadian soccer an easy target for match-fixing
- Lippi faces 1st Asian test since moving to China
Submited by Gillan - Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback



Thank you for writing this article in your own unique way. I’ve been hoping to find clear information like this. You really helped clear up a lot of my confusion.
I am in awe of this quality unique content. You may not know how rare that is in today’s writing world. Your points of interest in this article almost match my own thoughts. Thank you.
Your outlook on this subject has me rethinking my position. I am glad you shared this informative article. It’s helped me be more open-minded. You are a very persuasive writer.
Some of your viewpoints are very compelling. I have been persuaded to agree with most of your thoughts. That’s not the easiest thing to do.
I consider this to be information of quality and it appears to be written so as to make the reader think. I like your writing style and appreciate your efforts.
I agree with many of your points in this article. I appreciate your well-written content. You’ve made this article more interesting that others I’ve read.
This article is one of the best I have read in several weeks. You are a very talented skilled writer with great abilities and intelligence. You write almost like I think. Please keep them coming!
I am having a hard time fathoming how much research you had to do for this data, but I appreciate it and I agree. You make a lot of sense.